
Proposition 8 is an initiative on the California ballot next week that would legally define marriage as between a man and woman exclusively, thereby making homosexual marriage illegal by default.
This will probably not sit well with many of my friends or members of my church, but frankly, I am against prop 8, and here's why.
One argument is that gay marriage goes against God. I agree 100%. I believe it is a sin. However, we have a separation of church and state in our great country. No one is asking churches to start performing and recognizing gay marriage. We are talking about the legal definition of marriage. We are not a Theocracy. Someday, according to my personal religious beliefs, Christ will reign on Earth and all our laws will be God's laws. Now is not that time. Now we have a secular government, and I don't believe religious beliefs should affect secular laws. One of the things that bothers me most is how my particular religion has banded together to pass this initiative. I guess in some ways that's why I decided to post this--to let people know that not all Mormons, or all Christians for that matter, want to block gay marriage. Sometimes I think members of my church forget the second part of our 11th article of faith: "We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may."
I don't believe my church should perform gay marriages. I don't believe they should condone gay marriages. I don't believe they should teach it is correct in the eyes of God. But, I also don't believe they should be actively trying to keep people who do not hold our beliefs from having the same rights as everyone else under our secular laws.
The next argument I've heard is that allowing gays to marry will take away the sacredness and sanctity of marriage between a man and woman. I'm sorry, but I don't buy that for one second. One's marriage is as sacred as one makes it. What about marriages of convenience? What about marriages for business purposes only? What about arranged marriages that neither party really wants? Those are legal and take place every day. Where is the push to make those illegal? What about marriages between a man and a woman where the man domineers and abuses, using the traditional teachings of marriage from the bible as his justification? To me that lessens the sanctity of marriage far more than a loving couple who happen to be of the same sex.
The third and most logical argument I've heard is that the initiative is to restore what the people voted into law back in 2000 with proposition 22. At that time, 61% of the vote was in favor of changing the California Family Code to formally define marriage in California as being between a man and a woman. In May of 2008, the California Supreme Court overturned Prop 22 and declared it unconstitutional. So, here's my problem--if it's unconstitutional it's unconstitutional. It doesn't matter that 61% of California voters supported it. If every single voter in the US writes in Arnold Schwarzenegger for president on Tuesday, he still cannot be president. He was not born a US citizen and therefore it is unconstitutional, even if it's what the people vote for. Our constitution has made us the greatest nation in the world and it is the courts' job to make sure that our legislators enact laws that fall within our constitutional rights.
O.K., sorry to get deep on a Thursday night. It's just something that's been on my mind this week and I needed to get it off my chest.
I'll be expecting the Bishop to be stopping by to abscond my temple recommend any minute now.